|














| |

Guest spot: John Burson on income statements (As published in
The Zweig Letter August 4, 1997)
TOO MANY CPAs and accountants working for design and environmental firms fail to
recognize the unique nature of these industries when they prepare a compiled financial
statement for the board of directors or principals. Often, these financial
professionals present income statements in a format more appropriate for a retail company
than for a design firm.
The direct and reimbursable project-related expenses are sometimes
consolidated with the overhead (non-project-related) expenses and presented on the income
statement in alphabetical order. This form of account presentation may be
appropriate for an income tax return, but not for a financial statement presented to the
board of directors. What should a design firm's compiled financial statement look
like?
-
Show the basic categories needed to determine the key
indicators of financial performance. The income Statement should show the
basic categories suggested by the American Institute of Architects (AIA)
(Washington, DC) in the 1980 book by Robert F. Mattox, "Financial Management for
Architects." These basic categories are developed using the chart of accounts
suggested in another book published in 1982 by the AIA, "Standardized Accounting for
Architects," also by Mattox. Most industry-specific accounting software
use the standardized chart of accounts for architects. The software
produces an income statement classified by categories and subtotals suggested by the AIA.
The outside accountant should follow this format when preparing the compiled
financial statement for the A/E firm client.
-
Use net revenue from projects before direct salary expenses, rather
than gross revenue. Net revenue is gross revenue minus payments to
sub consultants and reimbursable expense. The income statement format shown in
"Financial Management for Architects" and used by A/E firm accounting software
would be more meaningful if a subtotal for net revenue from projects before direct
salary expense were shown.
-
Focus on net revenue, not total revenue or gross profit. The key
indicators of financial performance are based on net project revenue, direct salary
expense, overhead, and net profit from operations before bonus and profit-sharing. A
percentage analysis of accounts using net revenue as the basis, rather than gross
revenue, is more meaningful for the A/E firm. The relative value of the
pass-through revenue paid to outside consultants may vary from year to year and firm to
firm, so percentage analysis based on net revenue allows firm owners to better compare
their results from year to year and firm to firm.

|